DARS
Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS)
The DARS is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure state anhedonia, that is, the current reduction in interest, motivation, effort expended, and pleasure experienced in response to usually rewarding experiences. It explores four clinically useful domains: hobbies, food and drinks, social activities, and sensory experiences. Its distinctive feature is that it asks the patient to name their own enjoyed activities or experiences, which improves clinical relevance and limits the cultural bias associated with imposed examples. The DARS is particularly useful in the assessment of depressive disorders and mood disorders, as well as in the longitudinal monitoring of anhedonia in clinical practice, in research, or during treatment. Its subdimension profile helps identify whether the impairment mainly concerns interest, initiating action, effort investment, or pleasure itself.
- Number of questions
- 17 questions
- Estimated duration
- 10 minutes
- Language
- English
- Original name
- Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale
- Target audience
- Adults
- Authors
- Sakina J. Rizvi, Lena C. Quilty, Beth A. Sproule, Anna Cyriac, R. Michael Bagby, Sidney H. Kennedy (2015)
- Category
- Depression, Mood disorders
Scoring & interpretation
Each item is rated from 0 to 4, from not at all to very much. The total score is the sum of the 17 items, ranging from 0 to 68. Subscores can also be calculated by domain: hobbies 0 to 16, food and drinks 0 to 16, social activities 0 to 16, sensory experiences 0 to 20. The higher the score, the less pronounced the anhedonia. Conversely, a low score indicates more severe anhedonia. There is no universally validated diagnostic cutoff for routine clinical use, so interpretation should be based on the overall level, the subdomain profile, changes over time, and the clinical context.
Available alternatives
What psychologists think
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate this questionnaire.
Clarity and comprehension
—Are the test's instructions and questions easy for patients to understand?
Clinical relevance
—Does the test measure what it's meant to measure, and is it useful in a clinical setting?
Perceived reliability of the results
—Do the results seem reliable and consistent in their interpretation?
This assessment tool will be added to the platform in about 6 months
Every week, we add a new questionnaire based on your needs. Your vote helps us prioritize the most requested tests.
The more votes a questionnaire gets, the sooner it becomes available.