

MBTI
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
The MBTI is a self-report personality type questionnaire based on four dimensions of psychological preferences: Extraversion or Introversion, Sensing or Intuition, Thinking or Feeling, Judging or Perceiving. The version currently distributed in international and French-speaking contexts is the MBTI Global Step I. The tool is mainly used in counseling, career guidance, coaching, team dynamics and professional development to help formulate a type among 16 profiles and to discuss a person's usual way of perceiving, deciding and organizing.
- Number of questions
- 92 questions
- Estimated duration
- 20 minutes
- Language
- English
- Original name
- Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
- Target audience
- Adolescents and adults
- Authors
- Katharine Cook Briggs, Isabel Briggs Myers (1943)
- Category
- General
Scoring & interpretation
Each answer contributes to one of the four preference pairs. Scoring of the Global version assigns, for each dichotomy, a reported preference along with a probability index expressed as a percentage, which estimates the likelihood of obtaining the same preference on a new administration. The combination of the four preferences produces a four-letter reported type among 16. Interpretation should remain descriptive, should ideally be confirmed in an interview by identifying the best-fit type for the respondent's experience, and should not be read as a score of severity, normality or competence.
Usage
This tool isn't available on Mentaal. To use this questionnaire in your practice, you need a valid license. We invite you to send it directly from the publisher's website.
Available alternatives
What psychologists think
No ratings yet. Be the first to rate this questionnaire.
Clarity and comprehension
—Are the test's instructions and questions easy for patients to understand?
Clinical relevance
—Does the test measure what it's meant to measure, and is it useful in a clinical setting?
Perceived reliability of the results
—Do the results seem reliable and consistent in their interpretation?